Google AI Mode
The summary card that now sits above the blue-link results. The first answer most UK buyers see.
Free GEO Tracker · No credit card
Are you cited by Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, and Perplexity?
Traditional rank trackers tell you who shows up on page one. They don't tell you whether AI answer engines are actually naming your brand. aiCMO's GEO Visibility tracker watches every prompt that matters and tells you exactly where the gap is.
4 surfaces tracked50+ prompts per scanFree visibility report30 sec to first signal
Coverage
Four AI surfaces. One score.
A brand can rank on page one of Google and still be invisible inside the AI summary above it. We watch every surface where buyers now ask their first question.
ChatGPT
What ChatGPT names when buyers ask for shortlists, comparisons, and recommendations in your category.
Perplexity
Tracks both whether you're mentioned and whether you're cited as a source — the two work very differently.
Claude, Gemini, Copilot
Coverage across the secondary engines your buyers reach for inside their daily tools and IDEs.
Read it
Five reads. Five actions.
The tracker is useful only if you use it to decide what to publish, improve, or reframe next. Read it in this order — every signal connects to a piece of work Maggie can pick up the same day.
1
Visibility trend
Is the line rising, flat, or unstable? Rising means your brand is starting to appear consistently. Flat means you still need stronger source coverage and authority signals.
2
Total mentions vs. new mentions
Repeated mentions matter more than one-off wins. They mean you're becoming part of the answer set, not just showing up by accident.
3
Prompt-level performance
Which prompts you already win, which still belong to competitors. Each missing prompt becomes a content or GEO action inside aiCMO.
4
Competitor comparison
If competitors get cited more, they usually have stronger topical coverage, commercial pages, and structured references. The bars tell you exactly where.
5
Citation & reference gaps
Where your brand isn't yet giving AI systems enough evidence to use you in answers. The shortlist of pages to publish or strengthen first.
Visibility trend · 90 days
Mentions / week
Reference share · vs. category
moonlakespa42%
hand & stone28%
massage envy18%
elements spa12%
ActionIf you're missing from If you're missing from If you're
Every gap maps to a play.
A vanity dashboard tells you what's broken and stops there. The GEO tracker tells you what to publish, improve, or reframe — connected directly to Maggie's daily execution loop.
Commercial prompts
Buyers asking "best", "vs", "alternative to", "for [use case]".
- Clearer service or product pages
- Stronger commercial-intent coverage
- Comparison and alternative pages
Informational prompts
Buyers asking "how to", "what is", "why does".
- Stronger supporting articles
- More topical depth
- Educational content tied to your category
Mentioned but not ranked
You appear in the answer, but always behind competitors.
- Stronger authority signals
- Improved internal linking
- Fresher, prompt-aligned content
Rhythm
A simple weekly rhythm.
A repeatable routine beats a heroic audit. Twenty minutes a week is enough to catch every gain, loss, and gap — Maggie covers the rest of the loop.
Weekly check, then act.
The signal is consistent compounding over time, not every prompt moving at once. Two columns of work: review what changed, then move one or two pages.
Review (5 min)
- Visibility trend direction
- New competitor gains
- Prompts you still don't win
- Reference share movement
Then act (15 min)
- Create or improve one page
- Tighten internal links
- Expand obvious topical gaps
- Re-measure after indexing
Avoid
Four mistakes we see every week.
GEO is a young discipline. Most teams treat it like SEO, and most teams stop at the dashboard. Here's where execution actually breaks.
×
Treating it as a vanity metric
Visibility scores are an execution signal. If the number isn't telling you what to publish next, you're using the tracker wrong.
×
Checking only your own mentions
Reference share against competitors is the real story. "We got mentioned 12 times" means nothing without the comparison.
×
Focusing only on rankings
Position #3 in a result that nobody reads is worse than being a named source in an AI summary. Reference share > rank.
×
Not connecting prompt gaps to pages
Every gap should map to a page, an internal link, or a content angle. If it doesn't, the tracker is just a feeling, not a workflow.
See what AI says about you. Then change the answer.
Run your first scan in 30 seconds. We'll surface the prompts you already win, the prompts your competitors own, and the exact pages Maggie should write next.